Author: Amber George
Last Friday was Pepperdine’s annual VCLL case competition. I decided to participate in this ethics-focused case competition to support a friend and because there was the possibility of winning up to $2,000. Why not, right?
So three of my friends and I showed up at school at the painfully early hour of 7:45am on Friday, dressed in business suits and heels. Why did I think this was a good idea? Once we were given the case, we had two hours to read it and prepare our presentation. As most of you know, two hours to do all this is what makes the competition so challenging. To add to it, we were transported back to 1980 – no cell phones, computers or anything beyond a basic calculator allowed. We were given overhead projectors, transparencies and markers. A far cry from the PowerPoint and Keynote that I’m used to.
While my friends and I will all admit to being uber competitive, we were really just doing this for fun. So at the end of the day, we were not upset that we didn’t advance to the second round. In fact, no second-year teams advanced. Instead, two first-year teams and the lone FEMBA team advanced. Props to the first years!
However, we were a bit upset at a few other aspects of the case comp. There were some really prominent volunteer judges. However, some showed up late, some left early, and some clearly did not understand the point of the competition. I heard one team comment that one of their judges had not even read the case. One of our judges criticized us for bringing up ethics when it was clearly “a business case.” Hmmm.
I guess I was just disappointed at the lack of commitment from some of the judges. I appreciate that they were willing to give up a Friday afternoon and come to Malibu to listen to a bunch of case presentations. But, in my opinion, one who volunteers for something should do the appropriate prep work and allot the necessary time to complete the commitment. But maybe that’s just me.
On another note, it was interesting to spend some time with the FEMBAs. It’s a shame that the full-timers and the FEMBAs don’t get to spend more time with each other. During a break, the FEMBAs explained to us how different the FEMBA program is from our program, especially in regard to the lack of professor feedback and support they receive. Additionally, they lamented the lack of information and inclusion from the full-time program — they don’t get invites to panels or mixers or career treks. Shame. Especially if they pay the same exorbitant amount of tuition that we do.
So, all in all, it was a good experience. I honestly do not understand why more students don’t participate in the case competition. It’s a one afternoon commitment with the possibility to win $500, $1,000 or $2,000. It’s challenging and it’s fun. You can meet new people and network with business leaders. And who doesn’t love some free cafeteria food?
A special thanks to Jessica Grewal, Charlie Ombres, and the other volunteers for putting on a great case competition!